Every endorsing body assesses the same three statutory criteria. Almost every declined endorsement comes down to one of them being asserted rather than evidenced.
The three tests
- Innovation — an original business plan meeting a new or existing market need, offering a competitive advantage. A local copy of something that already exists elsewhere is the classic failure.
- Viability — realistic and achievable given your own skills, knowledge, experience and market awareness. This is where founders with no domain background get caught.
- Scalability — evidence of structured planning, potential for job creation, and growth into national and international markets.
Where plans tend to fall down
- Competitor analysis that flatters you. Naming three weak competitors and ignoring the obvious incumbent reads as either dishonest or unresearched. Name the strongest competitor and explain why you still win.
- Innovation stated, not shown. “AI-powered” is not a competitive advantage. What is technically or commercially different, and why can’t the incumbent copy it next quarter?
- No evidence of market contact. Letters of intent, pilot agreements, waiting lists, survey data from real prospects — anything showing you have spoken to the market beats desk research.
- Financials with no working assumptions. A hockey stick with no unit economics underneath it. Show cost per customer, price, churn and the assumptions behind each.
- A founder-market fit gap. If your background does not obviously fit the business, address it directly — advisers, co-founders, prior experience.
On funding
Unlike the old Innovator route, there is no minimum investment funds requirement on Innovator Founder. That does not mean money is irrelevant — your plan still has to show how the business will be funded to the point of viability. “I will raise a seed round” with no evidence is a weak answer.
Discussion: if you were endorsed, what did your assessor push back on hardest? If you were declined, what reason were you given? Please do not post your full plan — summarise.
Leave a comment